LandSpace brought an orbital rocket booster home upright on solid ground, a feat that until now was essentially SpaceX's alone
On 18 August, the Beijing company LandSpace landed the first stage of its Zhuque-3 rocket on land using landing legs, in what it says is the first time a Chinese company has done so. It joins a very short list of firms that can recover an orbital-class booster, but a booster that lands is not yet a booster that has flown again, and that is the harder test still ahead for LandSpace.

On its second orbital flight, on 18 August, LandSpace's Zhuque-3 rocket sent its first stage back to a controlled upright touchdown on solid ground, while the upper stage carried on to deliver the Honghu-03 satellite to orbit. LandSpace says it is the first Chinese company to recover an orbital-class booster on land using landing legs, the approach SpaceX pioneered with the Falcon 9. It joins a small group, SpaceX and Blue Origin, that can bring an orbital booster back at all. The limit worth keeping in mind: a booster that lands has not yet been refurbished and flown again, and LandSpace has not done that.
For most of the past decade, the sight of an orbital rocket booster settling back down and standing upright on its legs on solid ground belonged almost entirely to one company. On 18 August, a second company matched that specific feat. The Beijing firm LandSpace landed the first stage of its Zhuque-3 rocket on land, on legs, during a real orbital launch rather than a low-altitude hop.
Reusability is widely seen as the single biggest lever on launch cost, and the club that can even bring an orbital booster back is still small. That is what makes this notable: not that reusable rockets are new, but that the list of companies who can actually do the hard recovery just got one name longer, and for the first time that name is a Chinese company.
What LandSpace actually did
On its second orbital flight, Zhuque-3 lifted off, separated its stages, and brought the first stage back to a controlled, upright landing on legs, using grid fins to steer through the descent before relighting an engine for the touchdown. The expendable upper stage continued on to place the Honghu-03 satellite into orbit, so the mission succeeded on both counts: the booster came home and the rocket did its job.
LandSpace was careful and specific about the claim. In a statement on X, the company said the mission "marks China's first-ever successful recovery attempt of the first stage of an orbital-class launch vehicle using landing legs, and China's first successful booster recovery on land." It framed the flight as "a pivotal flight test for Zhuque-3 as it transitions from the technological demonstration and verification phase toward the engineering application phase of reusability."
That is the right way to read it: this was the test that had to work before reusability becomes a routine part of how the rocket flies, not proof that it already is. Zhuque-3's debut flight, back in December 2025, reached orbit but failed to recover its booster, so this was the redemption run for the landing.
Where LandSpace fits, and where it does not
Precision matters here, because it is easy to overstate. This was not the first time a Chinese orbital rocket had returned intact. That happened on 10 July, when a state-owned Long March 10B came back during an orbital launch. But that booster was caught in a net strung across a ship at sea, a different technique entirely. Zhuque-3 is the first Chinese booster to come down on land and stand on its own legs, and LandSpace is the first Chinese company, rather than a state entity, to pull it off.
Zoom out and the picture is a small but no longer empty field. SpaceX has landed and re-flown boosters for years. Blue Origin recovered its orbital-class New Glenn booster in late 2025 and re-flew one in April 2026, though it brings its boosters down on a floating platform at sea rather than on land. So LandSpace is not opening a field that did not exist. What it has done is join the very short list of companies that can recover an orbital booster at all, and match the specific, still-rare version of the feat that lands on solid ground on legs.
What Zhuque-3 is
Zhuque-3 is deliberately built along the same lines as the vehicle it is chasing. It stands about 66 metres tall, close to the Falcon 9's roughly 70 metres, and pairs a reusable first stage powered by nine methane-fuelled Tianque engines with an expendable upper stage.
Its lifting power is more modest than the headline numbers sometimes suggest. The version that flew is reported to carry on the order of 12 tonnes to low Earth orbit when fully expended, and less than that when it holds back fuel to land its booster, against roughly 22 tonnes for an expendable Falcon 9. A larger, uprated Zhuque-3 is planned that would close some of that gap, but it is not what launched here.
The clearest technical similarity is the fuel. Where the Falcon 9 burns liquid oxygen and rocket-grade kerosene, Zhuque-3 uses liquid oxygen and liquid methane, the "methalox" combination that SpaceX also chose for its much larger Starship. Methane burns more cleanly than kerosene, leaving less residue in engines that are meant to fly many times, which is exactly the point of a recoverable booster.
Why a landing is not yet reuse
Here is the caveat that separates a milestone from a finished capability. Landing a booster proves you can bring it back. It does not prove you can inspect it, refurbish it cheaply, and fly it again, and then do that over and over. SpaceX's real advantage is not that it can land a booster, it is that it has flown individual boosters dozens of times, with landings now numbering in the hundreds. Blue Origin has re-flown a New Glenn booster once, which is already a step LandSpace has not taken.
LandSpace has one upright landing, on one flight. The questions that decide whether this becomes an economic advantage are all still open: how intact the recovered stage actually is, how much work and money it takes to make it flightworthy again, how quickly the company can turn boosters around, and how much payload the reusable version gives up compared with an expendable launch. None of those are answered by a single successful touchdown, however clean. The recovered stage is now headed for inspection as the first candidate to fly a second time.
Why it matters anyway
Even with those caveats, this is a meaningful moment. Bringing an orbital booster home in one piece is the step that most new rockets never reach, and LandSpace reached it on only the second flight of a brand-new vehicle. That is a fast timeline by any measure.
The real test is what comes next. If LandSpace can convert this landing into repeated, affordable re-flights, it becomes a serious low-cost launch provider. If it cannot, it will have shown, as others have before, that the landing was never the hardest part, and that reuse is. Either way, the set of companies that can genuinely recover and reuse rockets is widening, which is the story that has quietly defined this era of spaceflight. As we covered in why reusability, not Mars, was the real revolution, the unglamorous act of bringing hardware back and flying it again is what actually changed the economics. For the fully-reusable end of the same idea, see the honest scorecard on SpaceX's Starship.
Frequently asked questions
What did LandSpace do on 18 August?
LandSpace, a private company based in Beijing, launched its Zhuque-3 rocket on an orbital mission and landed the rocket's first stage upright on the ground using landing legs. The expendable upper stage continued to orbit and deployed the Honghu-03 satellite. The company said it was China's first successful recovery of an orbital-class booster on land.
Is LandSpace the first company other than SpaceX to land an orbital booster?
No. Blue Origin recovered its New Glenn booster in late 2025 and re-flew one in April 2026, and a state-owned Chinese Long March 10B was caught in a net at sea in July 2026. What LandSpace says is a first is narrower and specific: the first time a Chinese company has recovered an orbital-class booster on land using landing legs, the technique most associated with SpaceX. Landing on solid ground on legs, rather than at sea, remains something very few operators have done.
How is Zhuque-3 different from the Falcon 9?
The two are similar in size and concept, both around 66 to 70 metres tall with a reusable first stage and an expendable upper stage. The main difference is fuel: the Falcon 9 uses liquid oxygen and kerosene, while Zhuque-3 uses liquid oxygen and liquid methane. The Falcon 9 also lifts more to low Earth orbit and has flown and landed far more times.
Does landing the booster mean Zhuque-3 is now reusable?
Not yet. Landing a booster is a necessary first step, but true reusability means recovering the stage, refurbishing it affordably and flying it again, repeatedly. LandSpace has landed a booster once and has not yet re-flown one, so its cost and turnaround remain to be proven.


