SpaceX's Starship finally did its actual job, and the honest scorecard is split

On Flight 13, Starship opened its bay and released real satellites for the first time, then flew the softest landing the giant rocket has ever managed. It also lost its booster and, quietly, still has not reached orbit. A clear-eyed look at what genuinely changed on 24 July, and what the hype leaves out.

SpaceX's Starship finally did its actual job, and the honest scorecard is split
TL;DR

On 24 July 2026, SpaceX's Starship flew its 13th test and, for the first time, did the thing it was built to do: it deployed 20 next-generation Starlink satellites from its payload bay. The upper stage then flew the softest, most controlled landing in the vehicle's history, settling onto the ocean and floating intact. Both are real milestones. But the giant Super Heavy booster crashed when its landing burn failed, and the flight was still suborbital: no Starship has yet reached orbit or been recovered on land. This was a rehearsal that finally went mostly right, not the start of operational service. Here is the honest scorecard.

For years, watching a Starship test meant bracing for a spectacular explosion. The world's biggest rocket had a habit of ending its flights as a fireball, and 2025 opened with three straight failures before the program clawed its way back. So it is worth being precise about what happened on 24 July 2026, because Flight 13 was the moment Starship stopped rehearsing the basics and started doing its real job, mostly. Not entirely. The gap between those two words is the whole story.

What actually happened on Flight 13?

Flight 13 lifted off from SpaceX's Starbase site in Texas and was the second flight of the third-generation "V3" Starship, the upgraded, more capable version of the vehicle. Over the next hour it produced a genuinely mixed result: a historic success on the payload and the ship, and a clear failure on the booster. Both halves are true, and any account that gives you only one of them is selling you something.

The useful way to read this flight is as three separate tests, judged one at a time.

The big first: Starship deployed real satellites

This is the milestone that matters most. According to Spaceflight Now, Starship "deployed 20 third-generation Starlink internet satellites in a real-world test of the rocket's Pez-like payload dispenser." Six of those satellites carried cameras to photograph the ship's heat-shield tiles. After years of flying empty or with dummy mass, Starship finally opened its bay and released actual, functioning Starlink V3 spacecraft. That is one of the rocket's core commercial purposes, demonstrated for the first time.

Now the honest asterisk. Because the flight was suborbital, those satellites were on the same falling trajectory as the ship, and were expected to reenter the atmosphere and burn up rather than enter service. In other words, this was a deployment demonstration, proving the dispenser mechanism works, not a delivery of working satellites to orbit. A crucial first step, but a step, not the finished job.

The ship stuck the landing, more or less

The second test was the return of the upper stage, and it went better than it ever has. Starship flew its dramatic "belly-flop" descent and then lit its engines for a controlled, rocket-powered splashdown in the Indian Ocean northwest of Australia. Space.com called it the softest splashdown the vehicle has managed. The ship touched down gently, tipped over onto its side, and floated on the surface fully intact, a first for Starship.

That matters because surviving reentry and landing softly is the hard part of making the ship reusable. A precise ocean splashdown is not the same as landing back on a pad, but it shows that the controlled descent and soft landing can be done. The vehicle came home in one piece, on purpose. For a rocket that spent years disintegrating, that is a real result.

The booster did not

The third test failed, and it is the one the hype tends to skip. The Super Heavy booster, the enormous first stage, was supposed to fly back and demonstrate its own controlled landing burn. Instead, only 10 of its 13 landing engines relit, and by the moment of splashdown roughly five were still firing. The booster hit the Gulf of Mexico harder than intended and was destroyed.

This is not a footnote. Starship's entire economic case rests on full reusability: catching or landing both stages so they can fly again, the way you would not throw away an airliner after one flight. The ship came home; the booster did not. Until SpaceX can reliably recover both, the cheap, rapid-reuse future the rocket promises stays on the drawing board. One out of two is progress, and it is also unfinished.

The word that keeps the hype honest: "suborbital"

Here is the nuance that separates a credible account from a breathless one. Flight 13 was suborbital. That does not mean it failed to reach space, it climbed well above the 100-kilometre Kármán line that marks the edge of space. It means the vehicle did not reach the much higher speed needed to actually stay in orbit, and instead flew a long arc back down by design.

The distinction is not pedantry. No Starship has yet reached orbit, and none has been recovered on land. SpaceX has since named the flight meant to change that: on its August 2026 earnings call, the company said Flight 14 would attempt Starship's first orbital launch, its first deployment of operational Starlink V3 satellites, and the first try at catching the upper stage back at the launch tower. It is targeted for as soon as late August 2026, though the date may slip toward the autumn, and as of this writing it has not flown. So when you see "Starship deployed satellites" framed as the rocket entering service, hold on: deploying satellites on a suborbital lob is a rehearsal of the motion, not the operational capability. The capability is close. It is not here.

Why this flight matters anyway

Even with the caveats, Flight 13 is a big deal, for reasons that reach beyond one test.

First, the payload. The new Starlink V3 satellites are far larger and higher-bandwidth than today's, each carrying roughly a terabit per second of downlink capacity, and they are too big for SpaceX's workhorse Falcon 9. They essentially cannot fly without Starship, which is designed to loft up to 60 of them at once. Flight 13 was the first proof that the deployment step of that pipeline can work.

Second, the Moon. NASA has picked a version of Starship as the human landing system for Artemis III, the mission meant to return astronauts to the lunar surface for the first time since 1972. Every landing and reentry milestone feeds directly into that timeline.

Third, the money. Flight 13 was SpaceX's first Starship test since the company went public in June 2026, in the largest IPO on record. The rocket's progress is now watched by public shareholders, not just space fans, which raises the stakes on every mixed result like this one. That is the sober frame for Flight 13: a program making real, visible progress on genuinely hard problems, with the hardest ones, orbit and full reuse, still ahead. For more from the frontier, see the Future section and our look at the year the robotaxi stopped being a demo.

Flight 13 scorecard

TestResult
Deploy satellites✅ First-ever deploy: 20 Starlink V3 (but suborbital, so they reentered)
Ship reentry + landing✅ Softest-ever splashdown; tipped over but floated intact
Super Heavy booster landing❌ Landing burn failed (10 of 13 engines); booster destroyed
Reach orbit❌ Suborbital by design; no Starship has reached orbit yet
Land/recover on land❌ Both stages went to the sea; nothing recovered on land